Back to directory
marco-trotta1 avatar
marco-trotta1 / badvibes

badvibes

Lint for AI slop. Audits a repo and prints a Vibe Score from 0 to 100.

4

Stars

0

Forks

0

Watchers

MIT

License

badvibes

npm version npm downloads CI license node

Lint for AI slop. Audits a repo and prints a Vibe Score from 0 to 100.

badvibes is a zero-config CLI that scans a repository for the things AI-assisted codebases tend to accumulate: missing .env.example, committed secrets, giant files, TODO/FIXME drifts, duplicated blocks, placeholder stubs, missing tests, missing CI, thin READMEs, unresolved imports.

It's deterministic. No LLMs. Just rules, file scans, and a little bit of judgment.

Quick start

npx badvibes .

That's it. No config file, no setup.

Example output

💀 BadVibes Report for ./my-app

Vibe Score: 63/100 (Neutral)

CRITICAL
- Missing .env.example despite env usage  (src/api/server.ts)
- Potential committed secret (AWS access key id)  (src/config.ts)

WARNINGS
- File exceeds 600 LOC (712 lines)  (src/routes/handler.ts:712)
- 17 TODO/FIXME/HACK/TEMP/XXX markers found. Top: src/utils/helpers.ts (9), src/api/server.ts (5), src/lib/parser.ts (3)
- Duplicate 6-line block found in 3 files  (src/a.ts:42, src/b.ts:17)

INFO
- Possibly unused dependency: lodash  (package.json)
- Mixed filename conventions in src/components/: kebab(4), pascal(3)

Verdict:
Functional, but worth cleaning up before shipping.

Why

AI pair-programming produces code faster than anyone can review it. That code tends to ship with the same handful of problems:

  • secrets hard-coded during "let me just test this"
  • mock for now / sample data / // TODO: real implementation
  • giant files that were refactored by "just extend this one"
  • three copies of the same function in different folders
  • no .env.example to onboard the next human

badvibes puts a number on it.

Install

# one-off
npx badvibes .

# as a dev dependency
npm install --save-dev badvibes

Requires Node.js 18+.

Usage

badvibes            # audit cwd
badvibes .          # same
badvibes ./my-app   # audit another path

badvibes --json .                        # machine-readable output
badvibes --strict .                      # harsher scoring + non-zero exit if score < 70
badvibes --roast .                       # roast issue descriptions
badvibes --no-funny .                    # dry verdict
badvibes --max-file-lines 800 .          # override large-file threshold
badvibes --help
badvibes --version

Flags

Flag Default Description
--json false Print a structured JSON report instead of the terminal view.
--strict false Multiplies penalties by 1.5 and returns exit code 1 when score < 70 or any critical issue exists.
--roast false Rewrites issue descriptions as hardcoded roasts. Suppressed by --no-funny.
--no-funny Removes the verdict line; prints a dry summary instead.
--max-file-lines <n> 600 Severe threshold for file size. Warning threshold is half of this.
-v, --version Print version.
-h, --help Print usage.

GitHub Action

Use the GitHub Action to run badvibes on every pull request and post a clean PR comment with the score, verdict, and issue table.

name: badvibes

on:
  pull_request:

permissions:
  contents: read
  issues: write
  pull-requests: write

jobs:
  badvibes:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - name: Check out repository
        uses: actions/checkout@v4

      - name: Run badvibes
        uses: marco-trotta1/badvibes@main
        with:
          github-token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
          strict: true

With strict: true, the action runs badvibes --strict and fails the check only when the resulting score is below 70. Set strict: false to keep it informational.

JSON shape

{
  "target": "/abs/path/to/repo",
  "score": 63,
  "band": "Neutral",
  "strict": false,
  "summary": { "critical": 1, "warnings": 3, "info": 2 },
  "issues": [
    {
      "severity": "critical",
      "code": "missing-env-example",
      "message": "Missing .env.example despite env usage",
      "file": ".env.example",
      "line": null
    }
  ],
  "verdict": "Functional, but worth cleaning up before shipping."
}

Score bands

Band Range Meaning
Pristine 90–100 Looks clean. Nothing meaningful to fix right now.
Clean 75–89 Solid overall. A few small things worth tightening.
Neutral 60–74 Functional, but worth cleaning up before shipping.
Needs Rebuild 40–59 Real structural problems. Plan some focused cleanup.
Nuke it 0–39 Hard to salvage without serious rework.

Scores start at 100 and subtract per issue. Representative weights:

Issue Severity Penalty
Missing .env.example while env is referenced critical −12
Potential committed secret critical −20 each (capped)
No tests despite critical code (src/api, src/server, …) critical −15
Unresolved local import critical −10 each (capped)
File > severe threshold (default 600 LOC) warning −5 each
File > warn threshold (default 300 LOC) warning −2 each
TODO/FIXME/HACK/TEMP/XXX markers warning −1 each (cap −12)
Duplicate code cluster warning −3 each
Placeholder / stub language warning −2 each
Missing CI config warning −5
Missing README warning −10
Thin README warning −4
Possibly unused dependency info −1 each
Mixed filename conventions in a folder info −1 each

--strict multiplies these by 1.5.

What it checks

  1. Env example — detects process.env / import.meta.env usage and warns if .env.example is missing.
  2. Secrets — pattern + high-entropy heuristics for AWS, Google, GitHub, Slack, Stripe, OpenAI, Anthropic, JWTs, private keys, and bearer tokens. Skips fixtures and placeholders.
  3. Tests — looks for __tests__/, *.test.*, *.spec.*. Flags critical if src/api, src/server, src/routes, or src/lib exist without tests.
  4. Large files — configurable warn / severe thresholds. Skips node_modules, dist, build, coverage, .git, lockfiles, binaries.
  5. Markers — counts TODO, FIXME, HACK, TEMP, XXX. Reports top offenders.
  6. Placeholders / stubs — flags sample data, mock for now, temporary, fake data, placeholder, etc. in source (not docs).
  7. Duplicate logic — hashes normalized 6-line windows across source files.
  8. Unused dependencies — compares package.json deps to imports/requires/scripts. Conservative; only reports info.
  9. Naming consistency — flags directories that mix kebab / pascal / snake / camel filename conventions.
  10. CI — looks for GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, CircleCI, Travis, Azure Pipelines, Bitbucket, Drone.
  11. README — checks for description, install section, usage section.
  12. Broken imports — resolves relative imports and flags unresolved ones.

Programmatic API

import { analyze } from 'badvibes';

const report = await analyze({
  target: './my-app',
  strict: false,
  funny: true,
  maxFileLines: 600,
});

console.log(report.score, report.band);

Roadmap

  • --fix suggestions for common issues
  • pluggable checks via badvibes.config.ts
  • per-project ignore rules
  • HTML report mode
  • severity thresholds (e.g. --min-score 75)
  • more language-specific heuristics (Python, Go)

Contributing

Small, focused PRs welcome. See CONTRIBUTING.md.

Each check lives in src/checks/ and is a pure function over a RepoContext. Add yours, wire it into src/index.ts, and drop a test in tests/checks.test.ts.

npm install
npm test
npm run dev .      # run against cwd
npm run build      # emit dist/

License

MIT — see LICENSE.